Main Page - Latest News

Are non-white judges biased in "discrimination suits?"


Are you trying to get rich off a flimsy lawsuit by crying “racism?” A study shows that if you can get a black judge, you’ll be much more likely to win.

The ABA is an association that caters to liberal elitist lawyers. The association’s journal admits that race is skewing judgments. However it seems to claim this is a good thing, using the logic that only a Harvard graduate could believe.

CofCC.org has presented a lot of stories about “OJ style juries” refusing to convict black criminals. Now we see a similar phenomenon from the bench. No wonder the NAACP spends so much time demanding more black judges. They are the ones behind some of the most outrageous “discrimination suits.”

From ABAJournal…

A judge’s race or gender makes for a dramatic difference in the outcome of cases they hear—at least for cases in which race and gender allegedly play a role in the conduct of the parties, according to two recent studies.

The results were the focus of a program about “Diversity on the Bench: Is the ‘Wise Latina’ a Myth?,” sponsored by the ABA Judicial Division at the ABA Midyear Meeting in Orlando on Saturday afternoon.

In federal racial harassment cases, one study (PDF) found that plaintiffs lost just 54 percent of the time when the judge handling the case was an African-American. Yet plaintiffs lost 81 percent of the time when the judge was Hispanic, 79 percent when the judge was white, and 67 percent of the time when the judge was Asian American.

The comprehensive study, by professors from the University of Pittsburgh School of Law and Carnegie Mellon University’s Tepper School of Business, examined a random assortment of 40 percent of all reported racial harassment cases from six federal circuits between 1981 and 2003.

A second study (PDF), looked at 556 federal appellate cases involving allegations of sexual harassment or sex discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The finding: plaintiffs were at least twice as likely to win if a female judge was on the appellate panel.