Main Page - Latest News

Mother nature drives a stake in the "Global Warming" hoax.

The Global Warming Hoax

1) NASA has monitored the amount of ice in Antarctica using microwaves via satellite for the past thirty years. Last year, Antarctica had the largest INCREASE in ice in those thirty years.

2) Global temperatures have remained FLAT for nearly a decade.

3) Polar Bear populations are at one of the HIGHEST levels in the past one hundred years. Since the 1970 restrictions on Polar Bear hunting, the population has soared from about 5,000 to between 20,000 – 25,000. The Canadian wildlife resources reports that Nunavut has seen a 25% increase in the polar bear population in the past 20 years.

Now, the above information is kept hidden from the general population. In fact left-wing media outlets report outright falsehoods to promote the global warming myth. However, everyone knows that the following is true.

4) This winter has been the coldest in thirty or mores years for America, Europe, and China. The media can not hide this information. Everyone can tell from their electric bills alone, that this winter has been the coldest in a long time.

Now the Socialist schemers are in a panic, and you can see their cries of “global warming” becoming more shrill by the day.


But how did we get here? Al Gore’s hucksterism and that silly movie of his, which any legitimate scientist – even among the alarmist crowd – has to laugh at, deserve a lot of the blame. But the biggest problem was the way that the old media and policy makers embraced the collectivist agenda of the IPCC. This shameful episode has been an object lesson of what happens when we follow Obama’s doctrine of following the lead of the would-be global government crowd, rather than letting America and her allies lead the globe toward a bright future.

The catch phrase “2,500 scientists agree” (or whatever number you choose) became the mantra that supposedly proved how universal global warming consensus was, based on IPCC’s reports. But that consensus never actually existed. Of the scientists who participate in the IPCC, only a fraction are part of the committee that actually studies mankind’s effect on the climate. Of that fraction, only another fraction actually contributes to writing the portion of the IPCC’s report that deals with this issue. And, once that section of the report is completed, the IPCC prepares an Executive Summary of its findings, which is what the old media uses to prepare its stories on the IPCC’s work. The Executive Summary is largely the work of politicians and public relations professionals, and is thus further disconnected from whatever flawed science that may have been left behind, far upstream.

How bad have the IPCC’s Executive Summaries been? This post from Bishop Hill tells the story. Dr. Andrew Lacis, a colleague of NASA chief alarmist Dr. James Hansen, has no dog in this hunt in the global warming debate, but he found the IPCC’s Executive Summary woefully lacking in any scientific credulity:

There is no scientific merit to be found in the Executive Summary. The presentation sounds like something put together by Greenpeace activists and their legal department. The points being made are made arbitrarily with legal sounding caveats without having established any foundation or basis in fact. The Executive Summary seems to be a political statement that is only designed to annoy greenhouse skeptics. Wasn’t the IPCC Assessment Report intended to be a scientific document that would merit solid backing from the climate science community – instead of forcing many climate scientists into having to agree with greenhouse skeptic criticisms that this is indeed a report with a clear and obvious political agenda. Attribution can not happen until understanding has been clearly demonstrated. Once the facts of climate change have been established and understood, attribution will become self-evident to all. The Executive Summary as it stands is beyond redemption and should simply be deleted.