Main Page - Latest News

Memorial wall for crime victims
Submit a news story.

How the media treats black crime

First you have open admitted censorship of black crime. Then you have the relentless racially charged vilification of the police for simply doing their jobs.

From (by Kyle Rogers)…

There has been a longtime unwritten rule in the media. Black crime, especially black-on-white crime, must be downplayed. This has resulted in the rampant censorship of the race of perpetrators. What is most troubling is when media outlets censor information about dangerous at-large suspects to hide the fact that the suspect is black. Political correctness has taken first priority instead of public safety.

It used to be a complicated uphill battle to explain this censorship. In 2007, this became a lot easier. The website for the Los Angeles Times issued a public statement admitting that it was the newspapers’ policy to censor the race of crime perpetrators. Not only that, but the paper admitted that this censorship was widely practiced in the media:

“Racial information was once routinely included in news stories about crimes, but in recent decades, newspapers and other media outlets stopped mentioning suspects’ or victims’ race or ethnicity because of public criticism. Newspapers came to embrace the idea that such information is irrelevant to the reporting of crimes, and may unfairly stigmatize racial groups.” (Los Angeles Times, June 6, 2007)

There is another major issue besides the censorship: The relentless agitation-propaganda coming from our media when it comes to race and crime. The constant hyping of radical left-wing groups. The treatment of outrageous and incendiary claims by professional race hustlers as real grievances. Constant racial agitation against white people. The vilification of police officers for doing their job.

  • truthbetold

    It might be called political correctness, or politeness, but it sort of sounds like lying? Isn’t that what we call an intentionally false statement whether it’s polite or not? It’s certainly not polite or correct to the victims of racial lies.

  • RobRoySimmons

    We can probably start asking how long this current regime of Political Correctness can maintain its censorship of all the important issues?

  • foundingstockcracker

    Well isn’t that lovely. Kyle writes about how the end is a reduction in the “racial divide”. The comments on WND tend towards making good little “white boys n’ girls out of them,… and the end of this line of reasoning is what? “Freedom of association” means nothing if radical individual rights takes precedence over rights and responsibility to the group. WND is an inclusive group of what type Christians? .

  • ed g

    Our most dangerous enemy are those that control the news. Once they are removed, it will be rather easy to deal with the coloreds.

  • nobody important

    Congrats on scoring a article Kyle!

Advertisment ad adsense adlogger