#TruCons Insist Federal Judges Are Neutral and Objective
By Hunter Wallace
There is a lot of #TruConservative make-believe circulating on Twitter about this Mexican federal judge in the Trump University case:
Every human being is an individual first. pic.twitter.com/UYfG1oF2E8
— Dr. Ben Carson (@RealBenCarson) June 6, 2016
#TruConservatives insisting that federal judges are neutral and objective arbiters of the law is yet another example of such naive wishful thinking:
@occdissent Justice Sotomayor agrees with Donald Trump. of course, by common sense, we all know this to be true pic.twitter.com/CNZLv6xT6B
— Corporatocrazy (@Corporatocrazy) June 7, 2016
For decades now, Harvard, Yale, UCLA, Georgetown, Northwestern, the University of Chicago and other American universities have taught Critical Race Theory which holds that non-Whites are oppressed by systemic racism and justifies sweeping judicial activism to dismantle “white supremacy” in the legal system.
A few years ago, David French and the rest of the #TruCons at National Review had no problem acknowledging this. Sonia Sotomayor’s Senate confirmation and other uncomfortable facts about racial consciousness in the judiciary have been sent down the memory hole in an orgy of Trump hatred.
Note: There is even a “Latino Critical Race Theory” (LatCRT).